Jan 30, 2012

It’s been a while since I have checked in with Peter Schiff at EuroPacific, but as usual he is spot with poignant commentary after a Fed meeting and this week is no different.

Waist Deep in the Big Muddy

With its announcement this week that it will keep interest rates near zero until at least late 2014, the Federal Reserve has put another large crack into the foundations underlying the US dollar. In a misguided attempt to provide clarity and transparency, Ben Bernanke has instead laid out a simple road map for economists and investors to follow. The signposts are easily understood: the Fed will stop at nothing in pursuing its goals of creating phantom GDP growth, holding down unemployment, propping up stock and housing prices, and monetizing government debt. To do so, it will continue to pursue a policy of negative interest rates, while ignoring the collateral damage of unsustainable debt, virulent inflation, misallocated resources and credit, suffering yield-dependent retirees, and a devalued U.S. currency.

Not surprisingly, precious metals and foreign currencies rallied strongly on the news – with gold up more than 4.3% and the Dollar Index down nearly 1.6% in the days following the announcement. The Dollar Index is now down more than 3.5% from its highs in mid-January.

In coming to the momentous decision to extend the Fed’s prior low-rate promises by another 18 months, Bernanke and his cohorts relied on a somber view of the economy that is at odds with the sunnier view presented the night before by President Obama in his State of the Union address. To justify holding rates so low for so long, the Fed is choosing to ignore the fact that CPI inflation is currently running north of 3%. Instead, it has conveniently chosen to look at a hand-picked alternative measure, the chain-weighted core PCE, which comes in just a shade below the Fed’s arbitrary 2% target. How convenient.

After some changes in key membership at the Federal Reserve’s policy-setting Open Markets Committee, in which a few long-time hawks were put out to pasture, the Fed has now established itself at the extreme dovish end of the policy spectrum. Among other central banks around the world, it may now be outflanked only by some very profligate ones in South America and sub-Saharan Africa. Unfortunately, the FOMC has its hands on the wheel of the world’s reserve currency, and therefore its decisions may lead the planet into financial chaos as long as other nations are content to follow the Fed farther and farther into a swamp of liquidity. To paraphrase Pete Seeger’s protest of the escalation of the war in Vietnam, “we are waist deep in the Big Muddy and the damn fool yells ‘press on.’”

The only bright side of the announcement is that it provides precious-metal and foreign-equity investors a fairly good sense that they are on the right side of history. In order to keep rates low, especially at the long end of the yield curve where it matters most, the Fed must continually print money to buy U.S. Treasuries. This will likely push more investors into gold and away from dollar-denominated assets.

As a testament to their own faith in themselves to forecast economic conditions, 6 of the 17 voting FOMC members indicated that they would have preferred to keep rates close to zero at least through 2015. Some even had the audacity to prefer no change until 2016! This comes from the body that couldn’t predict the 2008 financial crisis, even while it stared at them from point-blank range. To look into a completely uncertain future and determine that negative interest rates can persist for another

four years without igniting inflation is to me the height of economic insanity. Sadly, the inmates have the keys to the institution.

The lunacy persists in the rest of the government as well, with Congress and the White House still failing to address our nation’s long-term debt issues. The Fed’s commitment gives these politicians a “Get Out of Jail Free” card to continue avoiding responsibility. The deficits will be monetized, so no real efforts need be made to cut spending or raise taxes on middle-class Americans. Central to these plans is the assumption that the rest of the world will happily park their savings in U.S. dollars forever. If the latest announcement does not disabuse the world of this notion, I don’t know what will.

As long as interest rates remain far below the rate of inflation, the U.S. economy will fail to equitably restructure itself for a lasting recovery. As a secondary effect, U.S. savers will likely continue to suffer from a lack of yield and a weakening currency. In the end, the collapse of the U.S. economy will be that much more spectacular due to the great lengths we have gone to postpone it

Jan 23, 2012

Here we are with many stocks and commodities right back at 2007 levels – as if we haven’t skipped a beat.  Yet, the average US citizen and the economy have not rebounded as well.  Take a look at the charts below which this month’s Atlantic magazine provides a great insight into how the recession has changed us.  If you want to look at a much larger blowup of the charts, follow this link http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/coma/images/issues/201101/numbers.jpg.

Jan. 16, 2012

With so many Americans reliant on Social Security for their retirement I find it helpful to check in a couple of times a year and see what, if anything, has changed.  Bruce Krasting is one of the guys I lean on to weed through the sanitized information/data that is provided to the public and give an honest, accurate assessment of SS’s real condition. I have long been saying the day of reckoning for Social Security will be here much sooner than we are being told and as such those that listen and get prepared now will be impacted the least.  Based upon the data presented confirms that day is accelerating upon us much faster than what is being presented to the public. Here is his latest …

Social Security Is Running Out Of Money At Least 5 Years Ahead Of Schedule

Full calendar year 2011 numbers are now available to calculate the results for the Social Security Trust Fund. Here’s a look at the key numbers that will be reported to Congress:

Payroll Tax Revenue: $669B ($642B – 2010)
Benefit payments: $726B ($702B -  2010)
Primary Deficit: $57B ($60B -  2010)

Other cash components at SSA:
Tax on benefits:  $23B  (2010 – $24b)
Payments to R.R. Retirement: $4.6B ($4.4B – 2010)
Overhead: $7.0B  ($6.5B – 2010)

Net 2011 cash drain: $46B ($49B – 2010)

Non cash items
Interest: $116B ($117.5B – 2010)
Paper surplus: $70.0B  ($68.5B – 2010)

The reported numbers will show a very small improvement ($3B ) in the net cash drain. This may cause some to look at the 2011 results and say, “See! Things are stabilizing and even getting better!” Let me try to blunt any enthusiasm in advance.

SSA measures (A) actual monthly cash receipts and then (B) makes assumptions about what additional amounts are coming in based on a series of macro assumptions (GDP, employment/unemployment, etc.). The Treasury Department pays SSA the sum of A+B. Ultimately all of the money is accounted for and any adjustments (plus or minus) are reflected in the next year’s results.

This system works pretty well as the annual adjustments have been fairly modest and the adjustments have been both positive and negative. That was not the case in 2009. The models that SSA uses significantly overestimated tax revenues in that year. As a result, there were very significant downward revisions to the actual receipts that were reported in 2009. Following is a slide of SSA’s monthly 2010 revenues. Note that the revisions to FICA and SECA from the prior years totaled $28B. (2009 and 2011 also have significant prior year adjustments.)

Image: Bruce Krasting

To regularize the data for the big accounting changes it is necessary to add/subtract the adjustment from the prior year and then look forward to what overstatements/understatements were made in the then current year. When the ins and outs are made, the results for the regularized FICA/SECA revenue numbers are as follows:

2005….$521B
2006….$553B
2007….$585B
2008….$615B
2009….$676B
2010….$702B
2011….$726B

The following chart shows adjusted Payroll Tax revenues minus Benefit Payments:

Image: Bruce Krasting

Looking at the data on this basis, you’ll see the actual deterioration that took place in 2011. 2012 will be worse than 2011. Benefits are going to jump by $50B+ next year. 10,000 new people are signing up for checks every day of the week. Add the fact that every one of the 55mm beneficiaries will be getting 3.6% more in their checks (COLA adjustment). The revenue side is a wild card. What will GDP be? If it’s around the 2% that is currently anticipated, revenues at SSA will fall well below plan. A flat economy (+2%) would translate into a $100B 2012 primary deficit (payroll receipts minus benefits). A number like that is not on anyone’s radar today.

The following is a chart used by the House Finance Committee. It plots the expectations for net cash drains at SSA. While there is plenty of red ink in the chart, there is not nearly enough to describe what is going to happen. Note that the expectation is for some improvement in 2011 and relative stability until 2018 when the red ink explodes. On the chart, I think today we are really at the 2017 level. 2012 will bring us the results depicted in the chart for 2018.

Image: Bruce Krasting

The 2011 numbers for SSA indicate that we are at least five years ahead of existing thinking on the SSA deficits. When this realization sinks in, it will break the hearts of the SS defenders. If we are, as I contend, five to six years ahead of “schedule” with cash deficits at SSA, there is no alternative besides cutting scheduled benefits. Raising taxes to fill a hole this big is not an option. Nor is it an option to maintain the status quo and allow for a very rapid rundown of the SS Trust Fund.

If we are going to experience what I believe we will, then the cumulative SS cash shortfall over the next decade will add ANOTHER $1.5 trillion onto Public Sector Borrowing (“PSB”). This increase in PSB more than offsets the $1.2 T of cuts that the congressional super committee failure has just mandated.

The consequences of SS (and similarly the other government retirement funds) on PSB over the coming years is not now being considered by those looking at America’s debt profile. It will be soon enough. The current thinking is that SS is a problem that can be worried about in another ten years or so. That’s simply not true.

Jan. 9, 2012

As we finish putting the holiday decorations away and finalize the clean up of our champagne filled New Year’s celebration it’s a great time to refocus our attention back to what may lay ahead in 2012. The cyclical bull market recovery which began in early 2009 was powerful in its first year, moderately strong in 2010 and visibly weakened by the end of 2011. Thus we have recovery pattern which is losing steam with each passing year. As such, the start of a New Year heralds some interesting possibilities for the coming 12 months.  While no one can predict the future, the following charts from John Lohman are excellent vehicles to help predict what may lay ahead. All of these items below are, as you can clearly see, in a long term continuous trend since the start of the decade.  One of the major tenets of successful investing is finding those long term trends and aligning your money accordingly