A little history - Tom Monaghan and his brother, James, purchase "DomiNick's," a pizza store in Ypsilanti, Mich in 1965. They borrowed $900 to buy the store from the previous owner. A year later, James traded his half of the business to Tom for a Volkswagen Beetle. In 1965 Tom renamed the business "Domino's Pizza, Inc". Ten years after that, Amstar Corp., maker of Domino Sugar, instituted a trademark infringement lawsuit against Domino's Pizza. It took another 5 years before the courts finally ruled the pizza maker did not infringe upon the sugar maker’s trademark. The rest, as they say, is history.

What does this have to with investing you might ask. Come on, admit it you’ve seen the those ridiculous headlines about how much money you would have if you would have only put $10k into Google when they went public back in July of 2004. The answer to that question today is something north of $20M (assuming you just bought and held). A nice, tidy some most of us might be able to squeak by on 😊. Well, it just so happens Dominos went public one month earlier than Google did in 2004 and as you can see in the chart below, which the better investment has (so far) turned out to be (blue=Dominos, red=Google)

bay area napfa investment advisor fee only certified financial planner 5-22-19.png

Dominos would have turned that $10k into $40M+. Outpacing Google’s return by almost 100%, Dominos has been the better investment. Sometimes the best investments come from places you least expect.

Same Outcome?

You can see in the chart below, the world stock index, ACWI, failed to breakout to new highs 2 weeks ago and continued pulling back last week. It should not come as a surprise the failure occurred where it failed twice before, in that $74-$75 zone. Patterns do repeat price and why as investors, we should anticipate this will occur, before it does. For now, price continues to consolidate between the $74-$75 high and December’s $61 low.

san ramon napfa investment advisor fee only certified financial planner.png

If patterns repeat, what should we anticipate the future holds? Looking left (to plan right) we see price of this index has gone through two other extended consolidations (’11-’12 & ’15-’16), both taking more than 80 weeks to resolve to a continuation to the upside. If this repeats again, we can expect the same outcome with price, in the short term, continuing its consolidation before finally breaking out to new highs, later in the year.  Why later this year? Patterns tend to be time symmetrical so while the current consolidation may not exactly match the prior periods, I expect it needs to further consolidate before we see it eventually break out. Until then, investors need to be prepared for choppy, news-driven volatile markets.

OF course, some major event/news (war with Iran?, trade agreement with China?) can throw a monkey wrench into all the best expectations and why as investors we always need a plan “b” … just in case.

From False Breaks …

One of the first adage’s I learned from one of my TA mentors was “from false breaks come big moves”. It’s supposed to be a catchy phrase about the potential for big moves in the opposite direction when price breaks out of an area of previous resistance (which now becomes support), moves higher and then reverses back below that prior resistance / (what has now become) support line.  A good example of this occurred in US stocks last year as depicted in the SP500 index chart below.

As you can see price broke eventually above the blue horizontal prior high level. Moved higher for a few weeks then reversed course and fell back below the prior breakout level. What came next, we all know, was our ~20% decline in stock prices that ended on Christmas eve last year.

san ramon best napfa fee only financial advisor 5-13-19 1 SPY.png

 With the TrumpTrade volatility dominating the markets of late, it is interesting to see the SP500 has fully recovered and moved back above last Sep 2018’s high (see below). But what is more interesting is to note the SP500’s price ended last week right back on the breakout level. If further volatility is ahead, it could be expected we see the SP500, once again have a second failed breakout.

Bay area best napfa fee only financial advisor 5-13-19 2 SPY.png

Of course nothing works 100% of the time, but the “from false breakouts” adage should still be front and center with investors at this time in case the markets want to repeat last year’s false breakout sharp decline.    

Lyft Off?

Long term readers know my distaste for buying IPO’s. It’s only because historically those that initially buy an IPO will only make money if they trade it. 99% of investors don’t know how to trade so it usually ends up badly because IPO’s are all about hyping a known company, drawing in the dumb money so the smart money (the initial investors and the bankers bringing them public) can get out.  This is why you typically see a ramp up when a company initially goes public and then the stock price comes crashing back to reality. Not always  …. but most of the time and the reason to make money on IPO’s, you need trade rather than buy and be a part of the crash.

The better strategy is to wait until the stock price falls back to earth and then buy, assuming it is a company worth my investment capital. The recent IPO, LYFT is a good example of what occurs. The major difference between LYFT and most other IPO’s is LYFT never got the initial buying boost as it peaked on first day of being public and has fallen almost 40% from peak to trough since. This is a rare occurrence for IPO’s but make sense when you consider how over capitalized the company is. Its long-term prospects may be good but a company making no money, has competition everywhere and a market capitalization of more than $20B is, shall I say it, overvalued.

As a for-profit investor it doesn’t mean the stock should be ignored, especially if it presents a price dislocation and is setting up for a potential directional change to the upside like it currently is. Taking a look at the shorter term, 2-hour chart of LYFT below, you can see it has formed an inverse head and shoulder reversal pattern during its recent sideways consolidation. This is a constructive setup if it breaks, holds and confirms above its neckline as it presents an upside target near April 11ths highs, a 15%+ gain.

san ramon certified financial planner cfp 5-6-19 lyft.png

 While I really like this setup as the risk to reward is excellent and as such took a few shares in my trading account early before any breakout occurred, I do want to warn potential followers the company announces earnings next week on 5/7/19. As a general rule I prefer not to hold shares into earnings but will under 2 conditions 1) if I have enough cushion in my entry price to give a high probability of a profit on the investment if poor earnings cause the stock to fall and I get stopped out and 2) if my position size is small enough to ensure a small and contained loss if earnings should cause the stock to fall. Either way its all about risk management.